Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Tuesday, April 22nd 2008

7:46 AM

MUSINGS ON POLITICS: BOB JOHNSON -- WILL SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS TO ME?

I  saw a short clip on CNN's Rick on the Road, where Bob Johnson, former owner of BET, was giving a long, detailed "translation" of Geraldine Ferraro's comment that got her removed from the Clinton campaign. 

First as a woman, I question why Bob's services where required to explain what she meant by her words;  Ferraro is an intelligent woman who can speak for herself and if she wanted to do so she would have appeared in front of any given camera.  Second, as an African American woman who prides herself on knowing who and why she supports who she supports, I take issue with Bob's  condescending, misguided belief that any African American who supports Senator Obama is doing so for emotional reasons, not logical ones...,and Bob does not now nor has he ever spoken for me.  But then, he is consistent in his actions and comments that have never been in touch with African America reality.  While the media loves to toss about the theory that African America doesn't know what it's doing and they love it even more when a Bob Johnson comes along to reinforce that paradigm,   The media seems to have selective amnesia: Didn't Jesse Jackson run as a Democratic nominee a few years ago?  He was successful enough to have the DNC look for a way to successfully train wreck that bid just in case it became a viable reality ( see Super Delegates), yet, he was not who I was interested in, because he was not bringing what I believed our country needed to the table.    And did everyone forget the display by the two Republicans on CNN, back when it was rumored that Colin Powell might consider running as a Republican candidate, who showed themselves for what they represent? (If anyone could dig up that clip, I am certain every Republicans would cringe if it were looped over and over again on every media station.)

 
So for the record, to anyone who is not African American, it is insulting, condescending, dismissive and totally inaccurate to buy into the media-driven assertions that people of color and African descent run around blindly supporting anyone of color and African descent just because they are of color and African descent.  Senator Obama is equally of Anglo and African descent, so technically, the very premise in and of itself is inaccurate.  Additionally, no one with ownership of the microphone speaks for me, just because they are of color and African descent.  Because this is a free country, the Tavis Smileys, Bob Johnsons, et al, have the absolute right to voice their beliefs and points of view, but they do not have the right to diminish, trivialize and/ or dismiss mine.  As for Tavis, since he was brought up in the Bob Johnson diatribe, knowing that he is known off the mike for believing his own hype,  -- don't get me wrong, he has had some points of view I have agreed with in the past, just not this one -- I still believe that when you make comments, which is how you keep the sponsors that you have  (can anyone say Walmart?  Can anyone say $4 M spent on lobbying in 2007?) -- you have to be adult enough, professional enough to take the heat. 
 
Yes, I know, African Americans can be over zealous sometimes and I do think we need to check ourselves, But then, Tavis knew that going in; he's been around long enough to understand that.  Besides, I do have another theory about that: What if he is having doubts about his own position and cannot afford to step away from it?  Unlike Elisabeth on the View, who said that she could change her mind and vote for Senator Obama (check her out on the Obama visits The View taping, I am certain it's somewhere on the Internet.) Tavis cannot afford to flip flop, his credibility would be damaged, his sponsor would not be happy.  You see, none of us know who people vote for once they get behind the little curtain. 
 
The strategy of the media,as well as the Clinton and McCain campaigns, is to place doubt in the minds of Anglo America, specifically the men, who are for Senator Obama for the same reasons I am; they actually listened to what he is saying about the issues.  And this is a new, uncharted waters for Anglo America -- looking past skin color and perceptions to get to a new truth, because change is crucial to this country's future.  We are on the precipice and we have to get this right, because this country cannot take another four years of more of the same.  But if you can make Anglo America uncomfortable enough about its decision making, then you can convince them to do what's comfortable, instead of what's right.  So ask yourself this question: have you ever heard the media state that Anglo America is voting for Senators Clinton or McCain because they are Anglo?  Why not?  Why isn't that vote any more an emotional vote, than an informed African American vote for Senator Obama?  I am not going to be marginalized, are you?  Speak up for yourself with your vote.
0 user comments / YOUR THOUGHTS

Tuesday, April 22nd 2008

7:40 AM

Musings on Politics: McCain - Is This Hypocrisy or What?

Because I do attempt to be fully informed, not one of those "emotional Negroes" as the media continues to attempt to define any African American who supports Senator Obama, I decided to watch at least part of  the Senator McCain interview by George Stephanopoulis on ABC This Week.  It was painful to watch a man who stuttered, sputtered and misspoke in an attempt to control his emotions (aka, temper) unsuccessfully masked behind a really odd smile throughout the interview.  He inadvertently said that he would increase the taxes of the general population -- in all fairness, I think he meant decrease, but when you run for the office of president should you be allowed to misspeak on such an important issue?  Personally, after listening to him, I find the idea of him as a president of this country kind of scary.  But let's put that aside for a second.  He went to great lengths in attacking Senator Obama concerning Ayers, in another guilt by association attempt to besmirch him, even though Senator Obama was eight years old when Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground   Ayers lives in the same neighborhood as Obama and was on the same board once.  I am still not clear as to why Senator Obama is to be held responsible for that.  But George Stephanopoulis had done his homework. After McCain's tirade about the purported Obama - Ayers connection, George then asked him to explain how this was any different from Pastor John Hagee, an influential minister who has endorsed McCain and his anti-Catholic comments.  McCain has embraced this endorsement, yet we don't see any repeated loops on CNN, NBC, Fox News of these comments and this has been all but buried as a news item.  Yet McCain has not distanced himself from this endorsement at all, he hasn't rejected it, his response on ABC This Week was "I don't agree with his comments," followed by a sarcastic "But thanks, for asking."    How hypocritical of him. More than that, how hypocritical of the media for not giving this the same level of coverage as given Minster Wright.  Wonder why?
0 user comments / YOUR THOUGHTS